Home » Columns » Currently Reading:

Rule changes for college basketball to adapt, avoid

April 28, 2015 Columns 1 Comment

As we noted yesterday, college basketball is not the sport in a sky-is-falling crisis that it has been dramatically exaggerated to be for pretty much the entire 2014-15 season.

Evaluation is always a good thing, though, and for that reason it’s perfectly fair to consider the sport and whether rule changes and amendments would benefit it. We’re glad to do that, taking a look at some changes we’d like to see, and some that should be junked from consideration for a good long while.

The number one change we would like to see in the sport, though, is not a rule change at all, and it wasn’t a rule change two years ago, either. In the summer of 2013, the NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee approved the re-emphasis of rules to reduce hand and arm contact. The so-called “freedom of movement” rules were not actually new rules, but merely a significant point of emphasis-and they worked.

Scoring in NCAA Division I men’s basketball averaged 67.5 points per game in 2012-13, the lowest levels in 60 years. It jumped to 71.0 ppg in 2013-14, not pre-shot clock levels but its highest level in 12 years and a comfortable number in line with those from the late 1990’s.

The caviat with the re-enforcement of these rules was that there was going to be an adjustment period, some long games with a whole lot of fouls. There also were going to be coaches who didn’t like them, because they went against the weight room-dominated philosophy that they had considerable success with. It turned out there were also officials who would not comply, either because of pressure from coaches or because they simply didn’t like being told how to officiate a game.

We all know by now what happened. As 2013-14 went on, college basketball increasingly went right back to its Greco-Roman levels of contact. Scoring levels continued to drop in conference play, and by this past season the sport was right back to where it was two years earlier.

The No. 1 change college basketball needs this offseason should be obvious: the freedom of movement rules need to be pushed again. And again. And again.

If they are, the sport will get better. And if some coaches don’t like it? Too bad.

If had to make a bet, would make a deal with anyone. Give us two years of freedom of movement rules, enforced consistently. If they fail to lift scoring, then go ahead, do whatever you want with the shot clock. Make it 10 seconds if you want.

We’re all but certain, though, that they wouldn’t fail. They were already working last year, and they would’ve worked better with even more time. It’s just a shame we didn’t get a chance to see it.

Rule changes we would like to see:
1) Timeouts reduced from five to three.
The easiest one of all. As long as media timeouts are now mandated for every single Division I game (even those that are nowhere close to a TV), then there is no reason whatsoever why coaches cannot subsist on three timeouts per game. Make them full timeouts if you like, but three is more than plenty. Next to freedom of movement, a reduction in timeouts is the best way to take the game back from coaches and give it back to players, while also making it easier on the eyes. This change is so far beyond due it’s absurd, and the fact that coaches don’t want to surrender them is exactly why coaches should not have any input on this one.

2) Further enforcement of the 5-second closely guarded call.
Often left unidentified as one of the biggest problems with college basketball is this: there is way too much dribbling. Way too much. One way to curb that is to increase enforcement of the closely guarded call, which allows officials to start their count when a defender is within six feet of a dribbler. Our gut feeling is that, in practice, the actual starting spot for this count has shrunk to about 3-4 feet, so the first suggestion would be further enforcement of the six-foot rule. If that’s not the answer, then perhaps the solution is to increase the distance to eight feet. This would be a way to encourage offenses to “shoot it or move it,” reducing dribbling and/or encouraging players to make moves if they are going to dribble. It also is a way to reward good defense on the ball, lest anyone worry that the game is becoming too soft when freedom of movement rules are further enforced.

3) Get rid of the restricted arc under the basket.
We’re told time and again that this arc opens up the sport. Watch a couple games sometime, and keep track of exactly how many block/charge plays happen in a game where this line comes into effect. You’ll be lucky to find an average of one per game. By far the most overrated rule change the sport has had in many years, and it just creates more confusion for officials who spend more time looking at the floor than whether a defender is positioned. Even with the arc, there’s too much for officials to watch and it is more than occasionally not called right anyway. There is already enough to look at with the block/charge call. Eliminate it, and the only ones who will notice it are the ones fixated with NBA-izing the sport.

Rule changes that should not happen, maybe ever:
1) Shorter shot clock.
In the last year of the 45-second shot clock, teams averaged 73.6 ppg. This past year with a 35-second clock, they averaged 67.6. There is no statistical correlation suggesting that the shot clock being too long is the reason that scoring has gone down. None. If anything, it’s the opposite, and we’d be better back at 45 seconds, something we’ll debate tomorrow. Next question.

2) Changes to the 10-second back court rules.
Some have complained about teams being able to call a timeout in the back court to save a possession, and then receiving another 10 seconds when they inbound after the timeout. Here’s the thing: if you reduce the number of timeouts teams have, this is a non-issue. If teams have three timeouts per game, those TO’s suddenly are far more valuable. If a team wants to burn a valuable timeout in the back court to save a 10-second violation? Let them. Even in the sport’s current state, defense is rewarded more than enough; there’s no reason to throw in yet another rule for it.

3) Wider lane.
Again, this is another one of those NBA rules that people think will “open up” the college game but that, again, does not take into account that college basketball is not the NBA and is not filled with NBA-level finishers and post players. In fact, college basketball already is struggling with back-to-the-basket post play. Force those post players to now work from even further away, and just watch for more clanked 10-footers, as well as more wild, out-of-control drives to the rim by guys who can’t finish them off.

Tomorrow: A 45-second shot clock? Why not? There is every bit as much evidence to support it as there is to support a shorter one.

Twitter: @HoopvilleAdam

Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. Paul Borden says:

    One rule I would like to see: A team scoring can not call a timeout after makung the basket while the clock is moving. This essentially would limit such TOs to be called only in the final minute of the second half and OTs. That said, perhaps this would not be necessary if the number of TOs a coach can call is limited to three as you suggest (and it’s a great suggestion). He may have already used them up by the final minute.

Comment on this Article:

Subscribe to Hoopville

Enter your email address to subscribe to Hoopville


Hoopville Archives

College Basketball Tonight

We hope you enjoyed COLLEGE BASKETBALL TONIGHT during the 2016 NCAA Tournament. COLLEGE BASKETBALL TONIGHT is a comprehensive look at the NCAA Tournament hosted by veteran college basketball broadcaster Ted Sarandis, along with co-hosts Mike Jarvis and Terry O'Connor, both former Division I coaches. It also included many great guests, including Hoopville's own Phil Kasiecki.

The show aired on AM 710 WOR in New York City on Sunday evenings starting with Selection Sunday and running through the NCAA Tournament.

Here are links to the shows:

March 13, 2016 - First hour | Second hour

March 20, 2016 - First hour | Second hour

March 27, 2016 - First hour | Second hour

April 3, 2016 - First hour | Second hour

Everybody Needs a Head Coach

Former college basketball coach Mike Jarvis has a new book out, Everybody Needs a Head Coach.

"As you read this book, I hope that Coach Jarvis' experiences inspire you to find your purpose in life."
-Patrick Ewing, NBA Hall of Fame center

"Mike Jarvis' is one of my special friends. I am so pleased that he has taken the time to write this fabulous book."
-Mike Krzyzewski, Five-time NCAA championship head coach, Duke Blue Devils

"In reading this book, I can see that Mike hasn't lost his edge or his purpose. Readers should take a look at what he has to say."
-Jim Calhoun, Three-time NCAA champion, UConn Men's basketball

Review on Hoopville coming soon!

Hoopville Podcasts

Talking Hoops With Ted Sarandis – January 20, 2017

January 20, 2017 by

In our latest podcast, we touch on a number of issues affecting conferences like Conference USA, as well as a big loss for Creighton, less mystery in Arizona, and more on the ACC as we look forward to the weekend.

Talking Hoops With Ted Sarandis – January 12, 2017

January 12, 2017 by

In our latest podcast, we talk about a short stint in the top spot of the polls, some developments in the Mountain West Conference, and more of the ACC before closing with the Big East and Atlantic 10.

Talking Hoops With Ted Sarandis – December 24, 2016

December 24, 2016 by

In our latest podcast, we talk about the great games Kentucky has been a part of lately. We go on to other ACC matters involving arch rivals, as well as some quick hits and a conference race that should be as good as expected.

Talking Hoops With Ted Sarandis – December 16, 2016

December 16, 2016 by

In our latest podcast, we talk about a coaching legend reaching a milestone, the defending champs looking very good and continuing their winning ways close to home, and some off-court news during a light week of game action.

Talking Hoops With Ted Sarandis – November 29, 2016

November 29, 2016 by

Early season tournaments are the focus in this episode, with a look at how strong a few Big East teams are out of the gate and how strong the ACC could be. Plus one SEC team had a big week outside the scope of tournaments.

Phil Kasiecki on Twitter

Recruiting Coverage

2016 Boston Back to School Showcase notes

September 12, 2016 by

We look back at the 2016 Boston Back to School Showcase, where a couple of Boston City League teams were among the most impressive on the day.

2016 Hoopville Spring Finale championship recap

June 28, 2016 by

We look back at the championship games of the 2016 Hoopville Spring Finale, which had a big local flavor as one might have expected.

2016 Hoopville Spring Finale preview

June 24, 2016 by

We look ahead to the 2016 Hoopville Spring Finale, held at a familiar location in Boston.

At the 2016 Boston Shootout, host BABC has a big day

June 8, 2016 by

Sunday was a big day for the host program at the 44th Boston Shootout

2015 Boston Back to School Showcase recap

September 18, 2015 by

The Boston Back to School Showcase gave high school teams from three states and north of the border a chance for a couple of early games. We take a look back at the day and a few who stood out.