Columns

Crystal Basketball




NCAA Tournament Crystal Ball

by Dan Hauptman and Michael Protos

March 3, 2006

In the next week, Dan Hauptman and Michael Protos will be spending a lot of quality time with their crystal basketballs. The calendar has changed, the conference tournaments are here, March Madness is upon us.

The 65 teams will officially be etched into the bracket in one week, but there is a lot of work that needs to be done on and off the courts before the final decisions can be made. The No. 1 question is which 34 schools will occupy the 34 at-large spots in the NCAA Tournament. Hauptman and Protos unanimously agree that this is the hardest component when filling out a Big Dance card, but they also have come to this controversial conclusion: the NCAA doesn’t need 34 at-large teams.

When the 31st conference was granted an “automatic berth” in 2001, the NCAA kept the number of at-large teams the same and added a play-in game between two No. 16 seeds on the Tuesday before the opening Thursday. Hauptman and Protos argue that this essentially makes the berths for the two smallest conference winners anything but “automatic,” as the schools still have to win another game to get the chance to lose – a No. 16 seed has never won a first-round contest – to a No. 1 seed.

In recent weeks, our Hoopville prognosticators have been having a hard time finding 34 worthy at-large teams in this year’s field. This may change if upsets in conference tournaments take away spots from the assumed at-large pool. But barring a wild last week, the committee ought to consider punishing the at-larges by one and making the term “automatic” ring true for the little teams that could.

Hauptman’s Hoops Horoscope Protos’ Prognostications

Connecticut
Duke
Memphis
Villanova

Connecticut
Duke
Villanova
Memphis

Texas
Gonzaga
Ohio State
George Washington

Ohio State
Texas
Gonzaga
Illinois

Pittsburgh
Illinois
Tennessee
UCLA

UCLA
LSU
North Carolina
Pittsburgh

North Carolina
Iowa
LSU
Oklahoma

George Washington
Tennessee
West Virginia
Iowa

Kansas
West Virginia
Michigan State
Florida

Oklahoma
Kansas
Boston College
Marquette

Boston College
Wichita State
Wisconsin
Arizona

Georgetown
Washington
Michigan State
Wichita State

Missouri State
North Carolina State
Georgetown
Marquette

Nevada
Florida
Wisconsin
Alabama

Nevada
Washington
Kentucky
Northern Iowa

North Carolina State
Kentucky
George Mason
Arkansas

California
George Mason
UAB
Bucknell

Michigan
Arizona
Missouri State
Bucknell

Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Creighton
Cincinnati
Michigan

Creighton
Northern Iowa
Indiana
UAB

Alabama
Seton Hall
Air Force
UNC-Wilmington

Cincinnati
UNC-Wilmington
California
Seton Hall

Southern Illinois
Arkansas
Florida State
Texas A&M

Southern Illinois
Texas A&M
Hofstra
Western Kentucky

Western Kentucky
Colorado
Murray State
Kent State

San Diego State
Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Kent State
Iona

Manhattan
Penn
Winthrop
Northern Arizona

Northwestern State
Murray State
Winthrop
Pacific

Northwestern State
Oral Roberts
Albany
Pacific

Penn
Oral Roberts
Northern Arizona
Albany

Georgia Southern
Fairleigh Dickinson
Lipscomb
Delaware State
Southern

Delaware State
Belmont
Fairleigh Dickinson
Georgia Southern
Southern
Last four in:
Arkansas
Florida State
Texas A&M
Colorado
Last four in:
Seton Hall
Southern Illinois
Texas A&M
Hofstra
Last four out:
San Diego State
Syracuse
Hofstra
Houston
Last four out:
Syracuse
Bradley
Air Force
Florida State
Conference Breakdown:
Big East: 8
Big Ten: 6
SEC: 6
ACC: 5
Big 12: 5
Missouri Valley: 5
Pac-10: 4
Conference USA: 2
Colonial: 2
22 one-bid conferences
Conference Breakdown:
Big East: 8
Big Ten: 7
SEC: 6
Missouri Valley: 5
ACC: 4
Big 12: 4
Pac-10: 4
Colonial: 3
Conference USA: 2
22 one-bid conferences
Shooting Stars:
North Carolina
Kentucky
Nevada
Washington
Shooting Stars:
Ohio State
LSU
Alabama
Texas A&M
Sinking Ships:
North Carolina State
Tennessee
Northern Iowa
Cincinnati
Sinking Ships:
Syracuse
Florida
Northern Iowa
North Carolina State

As mentioned above, Hauptman and Protos would rather give a truly automatic bid in a field of 64 to Delaware State, Georgia Southern and Southern than let Colorado or Hofstra sneak into the field of 65. Hauptman and Protos both see Southern as the bottom seed in the NCAA Tournament, but the former pairs the Jaguars with Delaware State while Protos puts them with Georgia Southern.

With conference tournaments well under way, some of these teams will soon lock up their bids. And as teams like Bucknell, George Mason and Gonzaga take the court this weekend, all the bubble teams’ fans will be furiously rooting for those schools in hopes that their respective conferences don’t steal extra bids. The Crystal Basketball, however, would not mind a few extra invitations for supposed one-bid conferences to weed out weak bubble teams like Colorado, Hofstra, Texas A&M and Seton Hall. Of course, Hofstra has an excellent chance to earn the CAA’s automatic bid by winning the conference tournament in Richmond.

Among the major conferences, the battle at the top remains unsettled with Duke, Memphis, Villanova and Texas all losing within the past week. Connecticut is now the top No. 1 du jour for Hauptman and Protos, while they both have Duke at the second No. 1 spot. Given the losses of most of the top squads, the Crystal Basketball observers continue to place Villanova and Memphis among the No. 1 seeds. But watch out for Ohio State and Gonzaga, two teams that had been on the outside of the No. 1 discussion until this week.

Two interesting teams to watch in their last regular-season games and conference tournaments are LSU and North Carolina. The Tigers and Tar Heels have young teams with veteran leadership at key positions. Both are playing their best basketball at the end of the season. Protos has LSU and North Carolina as No. 3 seeds, while Hauptman predicts they will land No. 4 seeds. But given the fluidity at the top, both teams could surge forward. A No. 2 is very reasonable, which would be a shock considering neither team was ranked to start the season.

Whose field looks more accurate to you? Or are both Hauptman and Protos off target? E-mail comments on the Crystal Basketball or give us your NCAA Tournament prognostications. Then check back throughout this final week, as Hauptman’s and Protos’ visions for the Big Dance will become clearer and clearer as the days until Selection Sunday count down. The calendar reads March. Madness ensues.

>
     

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.